Tag Archives: hate preaching

Wangs Watch: Let he who is without sin…

You have to question Labour lawyer Ian Smart’s judgement using the ‘P’ word in a tweet, no matter the context or alleged intent of its use. Whatever Mr Smart has to say from now on in the Indy debate, he will always have to face the jibe that he is nothing but a ‘racist’. Ho hum. Next! Leading the online lynch mob of faux Nationalist outrage was our regular paragon of hypocrisy, overt smear and covert libel – the Reverend ‘hate preacher’ Campbell of Wangs Over Skintland. AhDinnaeKen investigates:

So that's the majority of the Scots accounted for then. What was that "inescapable implication" that Mr Smart made again.

So that’s the majority of the Scots libelled and labelled  then. What was that “inescapable implication”  Mr Smart made again? We* think we* should be told.

By Longshanker

A NOTORIOUS Nationalist hate preacher has been accused of stirring lynchmob style, faux outrage in order to  reinforce Nationalist stereotype ‘grievance politics’.

Rev Stuart Campbell, a self alleged ahem, ‘professional journalist’, claimed in a hate filled tirade that Labour lawyer Ian Smart “regards the Scots as vicious racist brutes kept in check only by the wise dominion of Westminster.”

The non-domiciled, self confessed misanthrope, who preaches hate, bile and blogs from Nationalist supremacy site, Wangs Over Skintland, also frothed: “The inescapable implication of Smart’s response is that Scotland as a whole would “turn on” ethnic minorities.”

Mr Campbell received hundreds of replies, comments and tweets from deeply hurt and identity wounded pro-Scottish 90 minute bigots Nationalists and responded: “The anti-Scots traitors are too many, we must smear them all.”

Preaching from his cubpoard under the stairs in Bath, the haunting memory of Mr Campbell’s notorious 2006 Future Publishing court case now appears to have been mostly exorcised from his tortured mind.

Campbell’s over inflated ego was thoroughly ‘bitch slapped’, flattened, demolished and destroyed when his sanctimonious self righteous crusade of greed justice, lodged against previous employers Future Publishing, was thrown out of court on a point of due process – leaving him liable for some not inconsiderable legal fees running into thousands of personally ruinous pounds sterling.

And this, despite Future Publishing having previously offered to settle out of court for a not inconsiderable sum, also running into thousands of pounds.

Critics point to Campbell’s risible lack of ‘self representing’ rationality when dealing with the fearsome reality of copyright claims, multi-million pound companies and professional corporate lawyers.

In a woe is me monologue cataloguing the tedious details of his laughably Quixotic crusade for money justice, Mr Campbell whined: “As for Future and their lawyer scum, I hope they fucking die.”

Unfortunately for Mr Campbell, they didn’t fucking die, though the link to the original monologue mysteriously fucking disappeared following a reference to it by a fucking Wangs commenter.

Critics have claimed Mr Campbell’s vindictive campaign against Ian Smart may originate from a pathological hatred of “lawyer scum”. Mr Campbell is 45.

Fortunately for Mr Campbell, those outstanding discomfiting legal fees are now being picked up and paid for by his halfwit acolytes of hate, intolerance and grievance confirmation, the Wangers – who allegedly gifted him more than £30,000 recently.

As rational-ish critics of the stooshie point out, Ian Smart might be a bit of a w**k, but his lambasting on Twitter and consequent poor show on Scotnicht means it’s probably best to ignore the guy and stop pointscoring.

Now that’s what I call ahem, ‘professional journalism’.

And we*'ll write what we* want too if it's not too empirically arresting.

And we*’ll write what we* want too if it’s not too empirically arresting.

d

Advertisements

8 Comments

Filed under CyberNats, Wangs Watch

An open challenge to Joan McAlpine MSP

Joan McAlpine accuses AhDinnaeKen of hate preaching, libel and smears. The Parliamentary Liaison Officer further compounds the accusation by stating that Longershanker would be charged if his identity was exposed. Do I smell a challenge or is is just standard Tu Quoque politico pish on a plate? AhDinnaeKen takes a look.

"If you call your opponent a politician, it's grounds for libel." - Mark Russel.  Indeed. Joan's an alleged politician alright. A Nationalist McCarthyite style politician.

“If you call your opponent a politician, it’s grounds for libel.” – Mark Russel. Indeed. Joan’s a politician alright. A Nationalist McCarthyite style politician.

By Longershanker

OOER READERS, another case of the Potty throwing stones in the glasshouse at the kettle.

This time, it’s Joan McAlpine, Parliamentary Liaison Officer to the First Minister doing the casting of the first stones.

On Easter Sunday too. Tsk tsk. If you had shame Joan, you should hide your head in it.

AhDinnaeKen will come straight to the point now that the preliminary pleasantries are out of the way.

Take a look at the Tweets above and then consider the following:

Joan Tweets a link to her 6,000+ followers pointing them to a Wangs piece which exposes Labour MP Ian Davidson fibbing on camera about his voting record on the bedrooom tax.

Woo hoo! Result for the SNP! They’ve been desperately trying to discredit and smear the ignoramus Scottish Affairs Committee bootboy for ages and now they’ve got him.

Smears, libel and lies

No fabrications by Dr Eilidh Whiteford MP required, no sustained below the line wormtongue whispers by Gail Lythgoe, Joan’s researcher, needed.

So far so good for the SNP smear machine. A citizen journalist (not WANGS), got Davidson where the £1 million plus SNP Star Chamber couldn’t.

But, and this is a big BUT. Take a closer look at Joan’s Tweet. It draws attention to Wangs, not the real disseminator of the exposee.

Why not? Surely such a scoop needs the correct attribution by a Parliamentary Liaison Officer?

A big question needing answered and, indeed, the reason AhDinnaeKen used our back up Twitter account to contact Joan.

The politician cannae take it captain
Joan blocked Ergasiophobe after this piece lampooned her record for wasting Parliamentary time. So the phrase “can gie it oot but cannae take it” comes to mind. But ho hum – I digress.

Longershanker asks Joan why endorse Wangs as the disseminator of the piece and uses the hashtag #endorsement to make a point.

The reply encapsulates everything which is wrong with Joan, the SNP and the Yes campaign – because, y’know, they’re more or less undiscernible (apologies to Patrick Harvie who is, of course, estimable).

In classic Tu Quoque politico mode, Joan makes the ridiculous claim that Longershanker would be charged if exposed. Ooer Missus!

In the context of the Tweet we* can only assume she means charged with, smearing, libel, hate preaching or anonymity.

The Challenge

So here’s the rub Joan. You have now committed the same alleged crime you accuse me of.

If you really believe I have a case to answer, have me charged.

I’ll hand myself into the nearest police station or lawyer’s office – wherever’s easiest – so that my real identity becomes known to you.

As, I suspect, your claim is just another empty, libellous, sham Nationalist assertion, I demand you apologise to me for so ably demonstrating  the attributes of smear, libel and #internetnutcase-ism.

And, just to show how fair minded, honest and tolerant I am, I even promise to apologise here over any alleged smears, libels, hate preaching etc., I’m alleged to have committed throughout the whole of my Twitter and  AhDinnaeKen career.

Oh. And one last word of wisdom, for free, to you Joan: You’re getting too long in the tooth to be a Tu Quoque tease these days.

Have another glass of Pinot Grigio or a wee white whine. You plainly haven’t had enough for the day.

Regards.

Longshanker – Editor of AhDinnaeKen.

14 Comments

Filed under CyberNats, Opinion, Wangs Watch