Oh dear! #2 A game of spot the difference for Natalie McGarry

AHDINNAEKEN IS willing to bet that the people of Cowdenbeath are counting their blessings following the actions of “Twitter personality” Natalie McGarry yesterday. When it comes to smearing she should at least follow the lead of fellow Nationalists who know what they’re doing. AhDinnaeKen investigates:

A recent Panelbase poll revealed the credibility of Nationalist smears by weight.

A recent Panelbase poll revealed the credibility of Nationalist smears by weight per 100kg.

By Longshanker aka @ergasiophobe

AHDINNAEKEN CALLED out the niece of Presiding Officer, Trisha Marwick, yesterday.

We* displayed a couple of tweets which highlighted Natalie’s, er, inconsistency, when smearing/labelling people.

The reaction to AhDinnaeKen’s blog by the failed Cowdenbeath by-election candidate was all too predictable. Nasty too.

Following the blog “Oh dear! Twitter personality Natalie McGarry caught out yet again“, we* received a tweet from Brian Spanner.

The initial tweet by Brian reeked of something that wasn’t very nice. In relation to Natalie he said: “her blood line could only get her so far. she is genuine bombscare material and i doubt she’ll get another run at a seat.”

Here’s how Natalie chose to display that interaction:

EXHIBIT A: https://twitter.com/nataliemcgarry/status/452890369177714688/photo/1

Carefully cropped picture for smearing effect shock! I can't believe that the niece of the Presiding Officer could do such a thing. Doesn't reflect too well, does it?

Carefully cropped picture for smearing effect shock! I just can’t believe that the niece of the Presiding Officer could post this when it was so easily exposed for the sham that it is. Doesn’t reflect too well on the quality or integrity of our prospective MSPs does it?

Makes it look bad for @ergasiophobe doesn’t it. The use of the phrase “blood line” has some pretty poor connotations. And Natalie seized the opportunity in as subtle a fashion as could be predicted.

AhDinnaeKen might be rude, very occasionally crude and mostly idiotic, but we*’ll always challenge the kind of language used in this instance by Brian.

EXHIBIT B:  https://twitter.com/Ergasiophobe/status/452874896742572032

The term 'Twitter personalit' implies that you know how to use Twitter. Extra lessons required for Ms McGarry perhaps.

The term ‘Twitter personality’ implies that you know how to use Twitter. Extra lessons required for Ms McGarry perhaps? Call it a hunch.

Not too difficult to spot the difference between the actual conversation and the way Natalie presented it – is it?

She did the same with another Tweeted reply by Pat McKane, but that’s all we*’re going to say about that horrible tweet. Check the @ergasiophobe timeline if you’re interested.

We*’re not going to say too much about Natalie’s rank amateur attempt at smearing, other than what was said yesterday: “If you’re going to smear with a sticky ‘one size fits all’ label, at least provide some evidence and be consistent.”

The evidence presented here speaks for itself. Next!

 

Advertisements

6 Comments

Filed under CyberNats, Lies, MobNats

6 responses to “Oh dear! #2 A game of spot the difference for Natalie McGarry

  1. Dear Longshanker

    “Carefully cropped picture for smearing effect shock! I just can’t believe that the niece of the Presiding Officer could post this when it was so easily exposed for the sham that it is. Doesn’t reflect too well on the quality or integrity of our prospective MSPs does it?

    You write a post about McGarry and then you get smeared.

    When I wrote this blog:

    http://glasgowunihumanrights.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/scottish-independence-natalie-mcgarry.html

    I got smeared.

    I wonder if some people might call this a pattern of behaviour.

    “Doesn’t reflect too well on the quality or integrity of our prospective MSPs does it?”

    I would be more specific that.

    Yours sincerely

    George Laird
    The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University

  2. Jay2209

    Any Moan McAlpine this week, or anything on Nicola Sturgeons ‘worst cuts to hit scotland in 2016’.

    • No source material for Moan McVulpine this week.

      I suspect Moan’s inspiration is in America working out which hotel bed to sleep in.

      Regards

      • jay 2209

        Indeed. She’ll be jollying on the taxpayers expense. Last week she was saying ‘use your vote to stop persecution of the poor’. More like ‘use your vote to stop persecution of the people by the SNP’. She was talking about ‘someone’ who had their benefits stopped because they couldn’t walk 3 miles from the job centre to the library, and another ‘person’ who had their benefits stopped as they couldn’t afford credit for their phone. I personally feel she does zero research for her article. She has made previous claims that energy bills are set to reduce in an independent Scotland by 2% a year, and that looking at a map will tell you right away that your are living in an unequal union. I presume this means that as Scotland is smaller than England? I think she thinks as it’s ‘only the Record’ she can write what she wants and no one will scrutinise it, but this shows the contempt she holds for her readers.

  3. Pingback: J.K. Rowing Gets in Twitter Fight With Scottish Lawmaker

  4. Pingback: J.K. Rowling Got In a Twitter Fight With a Scottish Parliament Member | Nigeria Newsstand

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s