Monthly Archives: November 2013

Former Prime Minister John Major warns Scotland

John Major gives his starkest warning yet to Scots considering breaking away from the oppressive subjugating Union. It doesn’t take much Readering between the lines. AhDinnaeKen investigates:

"Between Unionists and Nationalists there is no friendship possible. There is passion, enmity, worship, love, but no friendship." - Oscar Wilde

“Between Unionists and Nationalists there is no friendship possible. There is passion, enmity, worship, love, but no friendship.” – Oscar Wilde

By Gottabee Purrfect

FORMER OIL wasting Scottish asset stripping prime minister, Sir John Major, has warned Scotland that it should never allow Eddi Reader back on the BBC’s Question Time.

In a speech to the Institute of Passionate Natives Who Live Here, Sir John said there “cannot and should not be another BBC programme with that impassioned heidbanger on it.”

This is also the intention of the Scottish Government.

The Scottish Government said Sir John was right to suggest the rest of the UK should not have been allowed to see Eddi Reader as an “independence asset”.

Sir John’s comments follow  last night’s ‘car crash’ broadcast of Question Time throughout the whole of the UK.

He said: “It is quite clear that Eddi Reader should not be allowed out on her own.

“She is a danger to everyone she comes into contact with, particularly her ‘ain folk’ and the alleged momentum of the independence campaign.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if the Unionists tried to recruit her for Bitter Together.

“She could do more for Scots resolve than Cameron and Osborne combined.”

While conceding that the UK wouldn’t know what had hit it if Eddi was unleashed on the campaign trail, the former prime minister accepted that Eddi would take the fight to whoever wasn’t Scottish enough, or whoever didn’t live here enough.

Cringing, embarrassed, mortified, shaken, affronted and humiliated spokesperson for the Nationalists, Wee Naebudy said: “Christ, it huz to be admitted, that performance last night has probably set us back three hunner year.

“Somebody will huv to huv a word – but no me!”

Leave a comment

Filed under CyberNats, Opinion, Referendum

The 670 Commandments: How Moses Salmond will set his people free

The Declaration of the 670 Commandments. The silver bullet which is going to save our country and give us all our sense of self, identity and self respect back. The Nationalists launched 670 ‘visionary’ pages yesterday outlining the definitive case for an independent Scotland, for a country’s destiny. With apologies to King James VI’s bible:

"And the LORD spake unto Moses Salmond, Go unto Pharaoh, and say unto him, Thus saith the LORD, Let my people go , that they may serve me."

“And the LORD spake unto Moses Salmond, Go unto Pharaoh, and say unto him, Thus saith the LORD, Let my people go , that they may serve me.”

By Deck Larayshun from Mount Imaxi, Glesca.

01 And the sovereign people of Skintland said unto Moses Salmond, Hew thee 670 pages that will turn us to stone: and write upon these pages the words that have already been rent asunder in the Scotsman, the Herald, the Record and all the other Unionist forces of media oppression.

02 And be ready for the most historic day in the history of historic days ever, and come up in the morning to Mount Imaxi and present thyself there to me in front of the fifty foot screen.

03 And no man shall come up with thee, neither let any opposition politician be seen throughout all the Mount; neither let the flocks nor herds broadcast before that mount.

04 And he hewed the 670 pages which would turn thou to stone; and Moses Salmond rose up early in the morning, and went up unto Mount Imaxi as the sovereign people of Skintland had commanded him, and took in his hands the 670 pages of stone.

05 And the sovereign people of Skintland descended unto him, and stood with him there, and proclaimed the name of FFRREEDDDOOOMMM!!!

06 And the vision of FFRREEDDDOOOMMM!!! passed before them, and Moses Salmond proclaimed, FFRREEDDDOOOMMM!!!, the FFRREEDDDOOOMMM!!!, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and in truth.

07 Keeping mercy for thousands of bedroom tax victims, forgiving traitorousness and collaboration and turncoatedness, and that will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the Unionists, and upon the Unionist’s Unionists, unto the third and to the fourth generation.

08 And Moses Salmond made haste, and bowed his head toward his flock, and worshipped the sovereign people.

09 And he said, “If now I have found grace in thy vision, O sovereign people, let my sovereign Nationalist people, I pray thee, go among us; for it is a brassnecked people; and pardon our iniquity and our sin for ever having been taken in by thou Unionist pish, and take us as fools for thine inheritance.

10 And he said, Behold, I make a covenant: before all thy people I will do marvels, such as have not been done in all the earth, nor in any nation: and all the people among which thou art shall seek the work of the sovereign people: for it is a terrible thing that I will do with thee.

11 Observe thou that which I command thee this day: behold, I drive out before thee the Toryite, and the Labourite, and the LibDemite, and the UKIPite, and the Polite, and the Pakite.

12 Take heed to thyself, lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land whither thou goest, lest it be for a Unionist trap in the midst of thee:

13 But ye shall destroy their currency, break their media, and cut down their Unionist lies:

14 For thou shalt worship no other Firstminster: for the LORD whose name is SuperSalm, is a profligate Lord:

15 Lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land, and they go a whoring after their childcare, and do sacrifice unto their leccy bills, and one call thee, and thou evict of his bedroom tax

16 And thou take of their daughters unto thy sons, and their daughters go a whoring after their votes, and make thy footsoldiers go a whoring after their votes.

17 Thou shalt make thee no molten Unionist rebuttals

18 The feast of unleavened Ryder cup junkets shalt thou keep. Seven days thou shalt take thy entourage, as I commanded thee, and thou shalt destroy the receipts in the name of bureaucratic efficiency:

19 All that openeth the Neverendum is mine; and every firstling among thy cattle, whether Cybernat or sheep, that is male.

20 But the firstling of an asshole thou shalt redeem with a lamb: and if thou redeem him not, then shalt thou break his neck. All the firstborn of thy sons thou shalt redeem. And non shall appear before me prepared to vote No.

21 Three years thou shalt work, but on the fourth year thou shalt hide: in defeat and ignominy, thou shalt blame everyone but thy self:

22 And thou shalt observe the feast of five pensions, of the firstfruits of Westminster pension, Holyrood pension, Firstminster pension, MP pension and MSP pension harvest, and the feast of ingathering at SuperSalm’s career end.

23 Thrice in the year shall all your menchildren appear before the Lord SuperSalm, the ManGod of Skintland.

24 For I will cast out the nations before thee, and enlarge thy Schengen borders: neither shall any Eurocrat desire thy land, when thou shalt go up to appear before the Lord thy God thrice in the year.

25 Thou shalt not offer the blood of my sacrifice with leaven; neither shall the sacrifice of the feast of legal advice be left unto the Deputy Firstminster.

26 The first of the firstfruits of thy land thou shalt bring unto the Bute hoose of the Lord thy God. Thou shalt not shirk or seek to hide from the Lord SuperSalm his due.

27 And the Sovereign People said unto Moses Salmond, Write thou these words: for after the tenor of these words We have made a covenant with thee and with Skintland.

28 And he was there with the Sovereign People for what felt like 400 years; he did hee haw other than say “it’s Westminster’s fault”. And he wrote upon the document the thousands of words of the covenant, the 670 commandments.

29 And it came to pass, when Moses Salmond came down from Mount Imaxi with the 670 pages of assertion in Moses Salmond’s hand, when he came down from the mount, that Moses wist no that the skin of his chins shone while he talked with him.

30 And when Darling and all the children of Skintland saw Moses Salmond, behold, the skin of his chins shone; and they were afraid to come nigh him lest they pish themselves laffin’.

31 And Moses Salmond called unto them; and Darling and all the rulers of the Unholy Unionist alliance rebuked him: and Moses Salmond asserted at them.

32 And afterward all the children of Skintland came nigh: and he gave them in commandment all that Joan McAlpine had ‘spoken’ with him in his hotel room.

33 And till Moses Salmond had done speaking with them, he put a beamer on his face.

34 But when Moses Salmond went in before the Sovereign People to speak with them, he took the beamer off, until he came out. And he came out and spake unto the children of Skintland that which he was demanding.

35 And the children of Skintland saw the chins of Moses Salmond, that those chins shone: and Moses Salmond drew the veil over his assertions again, and pished himself laffin at the naivety of his so called sovereign people.

[With apologies to Exodus 34 and King James VI ]


Filed under Newspeak, Referendum, Uncategorized

MOAN MCVULPINE – Do you trust the Nationalists with the future of Scotland?

AS the pro-independence politicians get their collective sporrans and knickers in a twist about the most historic day in the history of history ever – MOAN asks us to remember the decades of cuts and inequalities that the SNP heralded in when they voted for Margaret Thatcher in 1979:

Moan McVulpine Banner
By Moan McVulpine Rewriting history, one shibboleth at a time

THERE’S A bit of a cynic in all of us. Nae wonder. It’s hard to trust but even harder knowing WHO to trust.

Some folk give up and shrug: “One’s as bad as the other.”

It comes from seeing Whollyrude MSPs fail to turn up for parliamentary questions – six times – pretend to care about road safety and get done for speeding and barefaced lieing in terms of the debate.

That’s why we MUST trust in the SNP or face the consequences.

Today the SNP publish the most detailed prospectus ever produced in history ever by a country on the brink of international humiliation.

It answers hunners o’ questions aboot Skintland’s future – whether we will go from bad to terrible or from terrible to bad.

It makes America’s historic Declaration of Independence look, er, historic.

Of course, that will not stop the other side trashing it. So who should Skints trust?

There is the Skintish Government led by SuperSalm, Firewummin Sturgeon and Backstabber Swindley. If trust is earned by action, then the three of them should be in the jail. They tell the truth – in terms of the debate.

We should remember that as we consider this new Solemn League and Covenant or White Paper or Declaration of Imax or whatever they choose to call it.

The SNP promised to end tuition fees – and college students suffered for it.

They promised to stop picking up cancer drug fees – and Scots people now go to England for treatment.

They froze the council tax, just as they promised, and helped subsidise the middle class proportionately more than the poor.

They promised 1000 extra police and now we have a centralised politicised  police force,  unaccountable to all but central government. Scarey stuff.

They tackled youth unemployment by rebadging those already in work.

Figures released last week showed the Scottish Government put more money into blocking Freedom of Information requests than any other part of the UK.

It’s paid off – no one but the most idiotic, deluded, Braveheart Commandos trust us noo.

Remarkably, this was achieved in a shorter time than it’s taken most other political snake oil hucksters.

The SNP have promised an independent Skintland will have anything anyone wants it to have. That’s the beauty of Radical Independent visionary thought – it diznae actually huv tae deliver.

An increase of one per cent in Skintland’s windbag productivity could result in 21,000 more junkets for the Firstminster to take his entourage on.

The No campaign offer no such vision – nae wonder.

Do you trust Bullingdon Dave and Osborne, whose economic policies have done less than me for SuperSalm’s marriage?

The answer should be a a resounding No. Yet despite the horriblest Tories in government we can remember, Skintland is still rightfully wary of the Nationalists.

Do you trust Darling’s eyebrows? Naebudy does. But they still don’t trust the Nationalists.

Ten of Darling’s Scottish Labour MP colleagues recently failed to show up at Westminster to vote down the bedroom tax. It’s convenient for Nationalists to forget that there’s a system called ‘pairing’.

So, when it comes to judging people by their record, there’s no that much tae judge when it comes to the Nationalists.

They’re high on bluster, low on delivery. At best they’re just as bad as the Unionists.

At worst, well let’s just say I widnae like to be a prominent Unionist if Skintland does achieve ffrreeddoomm!

That’s why, like the Unionists, ye cannae trust a word they huv to say on Skintland’s future.

When it all falls aboot their heids, wait and see how they react. Then you’ll see the real face of Nationalism.

Leave a comment

Filed under Moan McVulpine

An Epiphany of Nationalist Front Extremism

Supposition, whataboutery, assertion and self-referencing paranoia were all neatly encapsulated in one risible Wings Over Scotland epiphany this weekend. To add to AhDinnaeKen’s mocking laughter, award winning playwright Alan Bisset proclaimed the calamitous puffery as the “REAL” agenda of the No campaign. Oh our aching sides! Read on to find out why we just can’t stop laughing and will probably need a rib massage for the pain:

If this is the "strongest analysis yet" of the No campaign's "REAL agenda" then god help the Nationalist Front and their media monitoring mendicants. Next!

If this is the “strongest analysis yet” of the No campaign’s “REAL agenda” then god help the Nationalist Front and their media monitoring mendicants. Next!

By Longshanker aka @ergasiophobe

THE EVIL mainstream media and the “despicable” Unionist forces of darkness are setting “Scotland up to fail” in order to “walk in and occupy the ruins” according to a Nationalist Front conspiracy theory website.

Majestic pluralist, Stuart Campbell – editor of Wings Over Scotland – reckons that the country is going to be systematically impoverished by receiving more “responsibility” in the event of a No vote.

In a rare moment of lucidity, in a feature entitled ‘Joining the Dots’, the hate preaching bigot confessed to his slow wittedness in his realisation that “responsibility” will be an unpleasant consequence of Scotland’s independence Neverendum.

While repeating his current favourite Nationalist mantra of “no chance of the Barnett formula being retained“, he concluded that an unholy alliance of Tory and Labour party manoeuvres will stitch Scotland up, leaving the country worse off than it was pre-Neverendum.

And, as an added dire consequence, an emasculated and unpopular SNP will be “left unable to defend Scotland in the face of impossible financial pressures“.

Unofficial biographer of the Wings Over Scotland site, Longshanker, said:

This allegedly cited and sourced for truth ‘vision’ is a nightmarish scenario of the outlandish and terrifying type favoured by extremists of all persuasions.

The purpose of this potential calamity is an open and shut textbook example of “dire or catastrophic consequences from a situation or from failure to follow a specific course.” (Laird Wilcox Extremist Traits list No.13 “DOOMSDAY THINKING”)

It’s in keeping with the tone, extremist views and polarising philosophy of the site and ensures that the Wangers; acolytes, zealots, commenters, donaters and swivel eyed hingers on, remain assured of the importance of their morally superior stance in the Nationalist Front’s cause.“.

Award winning playwright, novelist, artist, performer, plumber, electrician, joiner and ‘creative’ poet Alan Bisset provided much needed morally superior support for Wings’ doom laden ‘positive’ vision of the future in the event of a No vote.

He said: “The strongest analysis yet of the No campaign’s “more power for Scotland” plans. Here’s their REAL agenda.

Talk right Alan! Whit ur yoo tryin' to say.

Talk right Alan! Whit ur yoo tryin’ to say noo!

But the double-chipped shooder playwright failed to take in to consideration the self-referential assertions in the piece.

Campbell’s first cited source of ‘factual truth’ turns out to be one of his own articles entitled “Margaret Curran is a liar“.

Well, it takes one to know one we* suppose.

It takes one to know one we* suppose.

Unsurprisingly, it backs up Campbell’s assertion and further refers to a news story in the Telegraph which states: “She also indicated her support for abolishing the Barnett formula.

This alleged ‘indication’ is the Telegraph’s interpretation of a speech made by Curran. At no point does the Telegraph quote her saying the Barnett Formula will be scrapped.

Ho hum! So that’s a “she said nothing of the kind” source of ‘factual truth’.

The rest of the links in the so called “REAL agenda” are  of a similar bent – Campbell citing and sourcing his own features in what can only be called self indulgent media studies masturbation.

To add to the hilarity, Campbell attempted to show a leg to the BBC with the “strongest analysis yet of the No campaign” by leaving it up for the BBC’s Radio Scotland Headlines to latch on to.

Laird Wilcox - Show a leg

Media tarting to the BBC. What a sellout turncoat Quisling eh?

It was completely ignored in favour of Newsnet Scotland, National Collective and Spectator blog stories. So much for the “strongest analysis yet“. Boo hoo!

If this type of whataboutery and self referential supposition is what Campbell and his band of Wangers think passes for analysis, then the meaning of analysis needs redefined.

It’s propaganda of the predictable extremist kind. If it wasn’t so stereotypical it could probably get away with being called risible. As it stands, it serves as a textbook example of Laird Wilcox’s DOOMSDAY THINKING – No. 13.

If ‘Joining the dots’ passes for ‘analysis in the world of Nationalist Front media monitor mendicants, then long may it continue.

There’s not too many dots needing joined up to see the picture Wings Over Scotland is trying to paint. Next!

Scotland in ruins. Labour party in triumph. Tories gloating over the impoverishment of the country. Everyone eating at food banks. We're aw doomed. Doomed I tell you. There's only one possible escape route from Armageddon. Vote Yes.

Scotland in ruins. Labour party in triumph. Tories gloating over the impoverishment of the country. Everyone eating at food banks. We’re aw doomed. Doomed I tell you. There’s only one possible escape route from Armageddon. Vote Yes. Do it for Alex. Do it for yer country.

Leave a comment

Filed under CyberNats, Wangs Watch

Moan McVulpine: Don’t put Independence on that plastic card

Moan says Skints are being pressurised into voting Yes so that they can feel morally superior and emancipated from the evil British empire.
Moan McVulpine Banner
By Moan McVulpinePlacing chips on shoulders, one chip at a time

THE PROPAGANDA says: “THE only vote you’ll ever need”.

Do they mean the Nationalist customised one, spluttering and splattering its way through the Valley of Unionist Media Lies?

Err, no… The “vote” referred to in the blurb is an oil funded land of milk and honey Yes vote.

It promises to help “make your self-determination dreams come true”. If you believe that, you will probably stay up late on September 18, hoping to spot a flying SuperSalmond.

Referendum dreams often turn nightmarish when your fairy Godmother is a slithering Nationalist snake oil huckster.

The IFS’s Crippled by Fiscal Reality feature yesterday revealed one in four Scots don’t care what the cost of a Yes vote would be.

One in one will start 19 Sep 2014 in the red because they put an X in the Yes box.

The Skinttish Government campaign, The 1228 Days of Neverendum, offers advice aimed at exploiting the vulnerable, the stupid, the xenophobic and the hopelessly romantic into voting for a land of corporate hegemony and severe spending cuts.

Victims descend into a black hole of communal fiscal debt. But they will be soothed by the knowledge that at least it’s fellow Scots who are imposing the misery on them, as opposed to the basturt English.

The campaign website encourages us to believe Independence will mean whatever we want it to mean.

Those who turn to Nationalism have often come a cropper with Unionists first.

Before the recession hit in 2008, you couldn’t find a person, other than hard core William Wallace and Robert De Brus types, who gave a sh*t about Independence.

Then the bubble of property based credit fuelled delusion burst. And that gave us Nationalists the real chance to exploit our agenda of grievance, paranoia and common enemies. And to promise a spending splurge which would bankrupt Norway.

Tear-jerking Nationalist propaganda links “voting Yes” ie thinking for yourself and not being a Stockholm syndromed Unionist stooge feartie, with how much we love swastika free saltires and the ‘superhero’ status of our dearest corporate backscratching leader.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t blame Unionists and don’t knowers for living under a rock trembling in fear at the idea of Scottish Nationalist emancipation in oor great wee country. They have good reason.

Joan McArthyalpine will be well rewarded for her numerous ‘services’ to the Firstminster. Anti-Scots Finder General will be her remit and she can sniff out anti-Scots types at 400 paces.

The ‘Did You vote Yes at the Neverendum’ test is already being shaped and formulated from her Dumfries & Galloway fiefdom.

And, in an emancipated Skintland, she will be given free reign and carte blanche to do as she wilt. Scarey stuff indeed!

Still, with her £53,000 plus salary and £20,000 plus expenses, Joanie knows what it’s like to be living hand to foot, dreading the next wind turbine taxed energy bill.

So remember kids, just vote Yes. It will be awright on the night.

It’s whit comes efter that’s the worry.


Leave a comment

Filed under Moan McVulpine, Referendum

Why @NatalieMcGarry needs to apologise to Scotland

She played the moral superiority ‘racism’ card on Ian Smart. She played the moral superiority ‘misogyny’ card on a fellow tweeter for the temerity of calling her “dear”, and she played a faux moral superiority card on this site’s editor when he questioned her endorsement of Nationalist Front website Wings Over Scotland. Here’s why AhDinnaeKen thinks the morally superior one should make a morally superior apology:

"I don't think for a second that Ian Smart is racist. However the language he used was racist." - Natalie McGarry. Wonder why Natalie is so quiet on her Scottish compatriots being referred to as "cringing pitiful scum" and "snivelling cowards." Sounds a bit racist to us.

“I don’t think for a second that Ian Smart is racist. However the language he used was racist.” – Natalie McGarry. We* wonder why Natalie is so quiet over her Scottish compatriots being referred to as “cringing pitiful scum” and “snivelling cowards.” by her new chum @wingsscotland. Sounds more than a bit racist to us*. Nationalist apologism at play perhaps?

By Longshanker aka @Ergasiophobe

WHEN IAN Smart chose to appear on Scotland Tonight earlier this year in May, it was inevitable he’d get a bit of a metaphorical kicking.

He’d previously conjured up a Twitter storm by tweeting, without inverted commas, that Nationalists would turn on the *Polls and the Parkas* in the event of Independence failing – assuming Scotland achieved such a hallowed state.

The big ‘N’ Nationalist with the size ten metaphorical boots, tasked with doing the boot-boy work, was none other than SNP activist and prolific Tweeter Natalie McGarry.

She didn’t miss. Without calling Mr Smart a racist, she played a relatively calm, if somewhat lightweight and unsubstantive, morally superior ‘racism’ card against the beleaguered lawyer.

You can watch the whole self-righteous non-event on YouTube here:

AhDinnaeKen chose to revisit the discussion – for the sake of a bit of empirical research – due to her current ‘inclusive’ and positively ‘progressive’ endorsement of Nationalist Front website Wings Over Scotland.

Here’s what Ms McGarry claimed on Scotland Tonight (7:00 mins) refuting the idea that there’s any kind of “Ethnic Nationalism” taking place within the Yes campaign:

“I totally refute every accusation that Ian is making about any parts of the Yes campaign, having eh, any parts of… any kind of official campaign, or anything that I’ve been involved in, having any racial element, beyond actually wanting to encourage people from other minorities, races, to come to Scotland and to make Scotland their home…” – Natalie McGarry, Scotland Tonight.

All fine and dandy, if somewhat garbled, civically inclusive Nationalist progressive stuff.

So, why revisit old ground? The debate’s moved on from Mr Smart’s questionable grammatical faux pas after all.

The curious part worth a wee bit more investigation however is Ms McGarry’s statement concerning her involvement in the Yes campaign. She specifically stated that nothing she has been involved in with the Yes campaign had any racial element.

What’s changed since then? Stuart Campbell of Wings Over Scotland wrote a whole article based on the premise that “everyone in Britain is a moron”.

Refining the somewhat generic statement, he proceeded to engage in racial abuse, stating that the English were “whimpering, spineless cowards” along with the Welsh who were “snivelling, forelock tugging wretches”.

An AhDinnaeKen piece entitled, “Agonising aunt: Natalie McGarry’s feminist love in with a hate preaching misogynist“, chose to highlight – in our* inimitable style – misgivings, following Natalie’s decision to let her writings be published on the Nationalist Front website Wings Over Scotland.

Her reaction to our feature was inevitably lightweight and a tad disappointing. She attempted to call out AhDinnaeKen for its number of followers, claimed not to have read the piece because she had previously blocked @Ergasiophobe on Twitter and proceeded with a lowly ad hominem attack on four Re-Tweeters linking to the AhDinnaeKen piece, by calling them “idiots”.

A curious state of affairs given her alleged and self proclaimed ‘positive’, ‘inclusive’ and ‘civic’ Nationalist credentials.

Let’s take a closer look at the blocking claim and Ms McGarry’s subsequent Tweets. Consider the Twitter based email alert below:
Natalie McGarry
The date’s clear to see. People clued up on searching Twitter timelines would have no problem in confirming that no Twitter communication took place between @Ergasiophobe and Natalie from the 13th August. So why she chose to block the acount after following it is anyone’s guess. Curious and, yes, a teensy bit bizarre.

McGarry - Dunc challenge -02 blockedStill, by claiming she had blocked me, it implies that some type of unsavoury/unpleasant activity, usually associated with a blocking, had taken place.

So go on  Natalie, please explain why you followed @Ergasiophobe in the first place and consequently blocked it later. Maybe a big boy did it and ran away. Eh?

As Noam Chomsky said: “If you don’t like what someone has to say, argue with them.” Or ignore them. But to follow and then block and then make a virtue out of the blocking with nothing having happened in-between is at best curious, at worst, hypocritical grandstanding.

Indeed, it’s almost as strange as having your councillor mother attack a Scotsman columnist for “barefaced lies”. Note that SNP Councillor McGarry relies on Wings Over Scotland to do her thinking for her. Like mother like daughter?

As for this:

And off I toodled.

And off I toodled.

Fair comment or infantilism? You decide. It’s worth remembering, Hitler had millions of followers, Jesus had twelve. Is the number of followers so important to her that she would make  a judgement call based on numbers of followers? Sounds more like standard evasion of argument in anyone’s language.

For Natalie’s information, I’m merely offering friendly advice. Publicly endorsing Campbell helps undermine and damage the Yes campaign. It associates the campaign with intolerant divisive extremism and nasty abusive cybernats. According to the Daily Record, the Yes campaign distanced themselves from Campbell due to his extreme views.

Last but not least, there’s McGarry’s ad hominem attack on the four ReTweeters of the original AhDinnaeKen piece highlighting her hypocrisy. Ms McGarry claims not to have read the piece yet chose to attack those who had. Civic? Inclusive? Progressive? Answers on a referendum ballot paper please!

I wonder what Ms McGarry would have Tweeted if she had read the AhDinnaeKen piece.

I wonder what Ms McGarry would have Tweeted if she had actually read the AhDinnaeKen piece.

AhDinnaeKen didn’t mean this feature to be so long. We* actually meant it to cover the recent For a’ That podcast in which Natalie shared a platform with Wings Over Scotland’s Stuart Campbell and singularly failed to challenge him on any of his extremist views.

Looks like that’s going to have to be another blog. Ho hum. Till next time then.


Oh dear oh dear oh dear. oh dear! It has to be assumed Ms McGarry turns a blind eye to Stuart Campbell's more potent misogyny.

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. oh dear! It has to be assumed Ms McGarry turns a blind eye to Stuart Campbell’s more potent less casual misogyny.

Leave a comment

Filed under CyberNats, Referendum, Wangs Watch

Audit Scotland is anti-Scots claim SNP

Will there be room in an Independent Scotland for any institution, business, academic or individual to legitimately question or attempt to scrutinise the Nationalist government? An alarming catalogue of evidence suggests the answer will be NAW! AhDinnaeKen reports:

"The only foes that threaten Scotland are the enemies at home, and these are accountability, scrutiny and Audit Scotland." - Kenny MacNaeskill

“The only foes that threaten Scotland are the enemies at home, and these are accountability, scrutiny and Audit Scotland.” – Kenny MacNaeskill

By Haudoana Minit

AUDIT SCOTLAND are talking Scotland down according to Injustice Minster Kenny MacNaeskill.

The so called independent body has been exposed by MacNaeskill as a barely concealed front for Better Together’s Project Feartie.

If they don’t pull their socks up and get on board with Scotland’s emancipation plans they may find themselves being “socially audited”, he warned.

MacNaeskill said: “It’s true there have been ‘creative tensions’ between my incompetent interference and the polis.

“We were deciding where the balance and calibration should lie in the power structures – whatever the f**k that means.

“The polis decided that I should keep my big chiselled calibrating face oot o’ their business for the sake of balance and Audit Scotland has agreed with that decision. Bastards!”

MacNaeskill conceded that sovereign anti-Scots may begin comparing his latest embarrassing SNAFU to a future post-Indy landscape.

And they may conclude that the SNP’s alleged ‘competence’ in government may have to be spelled with a silent ‘i-n’ in front of it.

According to Audit Scotland, the Injustice minster “hudnae a clue” what he was doing.

It appeared his business plan had been made up on the back of a fag packet in 2011 and had consequently been stolen by a big anti-Scots boy who then proceeded to run away.

As MacNaeskill later admitted to the British Brainwashing Corporation, this version of events couldn’t be corroborated: “Just as weel I’m getting rid of corroboration then.” he joked.

Cringing, snivelling, cowardly, anti-Scots, deranged, deluded, turncoat, traitor spokesperson for the Tory-lite Labouring party, Who Henry, said: “I am not surprised to learn that no full business case was prepared to support government centralisation of the police.

“This isn’t about saving money, it’s about ensuring the politicised police will be able to deal with the anti-Scots enemies within in the event of a Yes vote.

“They’ll be rid of pesky corroboration by that time and, if I was working for Audit Scotland just now, I’d be scared, very scared. Big Kenny MacNaeskill will be coming to get you.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Law, Treachery