AhDinnaeKen asks some embarrassing question regarding our fellow politically impassioned Scots. Are Nationalists thick, delusional, liars or all three? We* put all three queries to the test.
By Euro Eejits
FIRST THERE wiz a letter and then there wisnae a letter and then there wiz and it wisnae tae the liking of the SNP’s European candy floss machine.
Tae the Unionists it wiz funny, tae the Nationalists it wiznae.
But whit it proved wiz that the biased oppressive propagandists of the mainstream media at the Hootsman HAD SCOOPED AN EXCLUSIVE based on substantial TRUTH!!!
That’s richt! Michty me! Splice the mainbrace and batten doon the hatches. The Hootsman TELT THE TRUTH ABOOT THE CONTENTS OF THAT NON-LETTER.
European UNIONIST, Jose Beretta, let rip with his anti-nationalist propaganda barrels and telt the Nationalists they would huv tae pit the mendicant caps on and come begging to the Spanish if they wanted into the European UNION.
So, here are some example Nationalist statements concerning the Hootsman piece:
Tricky Dicky Salmond – Ducker, diver, barefaced liar and occasional Firstminster
“It is of interest to the people of Scotland now to find out where that came from. Was the newspaper duped by anti-independence people in the house of Lords Committee or the United Kingdom government. Was the commission at fault? But we know that that story is not correct. I think it is of interest to the people of Scotland because this might be an example by which we judge all the other scaremongering that will come over the next two years or so.”
Verdict: Thick – Naw tae mibbes. Delusional – Mibbes. Liar – Just say Yes
Deputy Miss Leader Sturgeon: Blame patsy and pantsonfire fighter
“Serious questions now need to be asked as to where these claims came from and what role members of the House of Lords Committee and the UK political parties played in this fabricated story.”
Verdict: Thick – Mibbes. Delusional – Mibbes. Liar – Just say Yes
John Swindley: Backstabbing right hand bead counter
“When Scotland votes in the referendum in 2014, and assuming there is a yes vote as a result of that referendum, Scotland will still be at that stage a part of the UK, and what we have always accepted is there has to be a negotiation about the details and the terms of Scotland’s membership of the EU.
“But crucially that would be taking place at a time when we are still part of the UK, and still part of the EU of which we have been members for 40 years.”
Verdict: Thick – Mibbes. Delusional – Aye. Liar – Och Aye the Noo!
NewsNat Scotland: Guardians of the Nationalist cause. Paladins of sanctimony and self-righteousness
“Exclusive: Scotsman EU membership story “incorrect” says EC.” – Newsnat Headline
“If, as is being claimed by the EC, that no reply to the House of Lords has been decided and no official letter has been sent, then questions will be asked as to the motivation of many reporters and journalists who have been eager to promote this story.
“If, on the other hand the EC have indeed sent communications expressing such views then there will be questions as to why denials have been issued.”
Verdict: Thick – Och Aye the Noo. Delusional: Och Aye the Noo. Liar – Naw – too thick and delusional.
AhDinnaeKen would like to point out to Newsnat that many scoops are often based on ‘unofficial’ and ‘incomplete’ information from a highly placed source; stolen or photographed documents, attendees at secret meetings for example. This was clearly exhibited by the Hootsman story.
The Hootsman’s scoop was a prima facie case of a real exclusive. The EC “Spokesman” response was the only response an official would or could give to ‘leaked’ information. Basic journalism. Doh!
AhDinnaeKen’s advice. Go back to remedial class and keep bleating.
As for the rest of ‘us’ non-converted. Ho hum. A prima facie case of just how little credibility or substance the Nationalists false assertions really have.